The wealth of health-related information drawn from medical records, pharmacies, laboratories, remote patient monitoring, and emerging sources like consumer wearables, offers a range of challenges and prospects for the healthcare industry. The effective integration, management, and utilization of this data is crucial for optimizing long-term health outcomes.
However, raw data collected by providers, electronic health records (EHRs), and laboratories cannot immediately translate into actionable insights. The genuine value of the data emerges when we transform it into practical knowledge. We achieve this by adapting the data to fit seamlessly into existing workflows.The significance of data becomes apparent in its ability to cater to the unique needs of individuals – determining who requires which information and precisely when they require it. At Availity, we term this customized data as “fit-for-purpose data.”
Clinical sources provide data to capture condition suspects and retrospectively code for reimbursement. In this example, relevant clinical data forms a subset of fit-for-purpose data. The data is delivered in a format that coders can consume, and they use it when performing retrospective coding.
Consider the multitude of diverse payer workflows, each with its unique intricacies. The data and its frequency that may suffice for one purpose, like quality measurement. However, it may not necessarily be suitable for another, such as care coordination. Consequently, we intentionally tailor fit-for-purpose data to cater to the distinct requirements of specific workflows. The aim is to optimize the value and influence of the data.
Several factors, including inherent variation, inconsistent terminologies, poor standardization, and other systemic data quality issues make deploying fit-for-purpose data challenging. These barriers often lead to poor data quality and the need to integrate data from multiple sources.
Creating data that aligns with the specific requirements of each payer workflow may seem like a challenging undertaking. Moreover, the additional complexity of integrating this data into existing workflows leaves organizations grappling with where to begin.
Payers are seeking assistance from clinical data integration vendors who specialize in producing fit-for-purpose data at scale. These vendors help payers utilize clinical data effectively for risk adjustment, quality measurement, care management, value-based care, and enterprise analytics.
The market is flooded with various technology-based solutions, ranging from end-to-end platforms to integration engines and terminology servers. To navigate through this crowded landscape, consider the following critical characteristics when selecting a clinical data integration partner:
Deploying fit-for-purpose data at scale is crucial for payers seeking to optimize the impact of data in downstream workflows. While a challenging and complex problem to solve, implementing practical clinical data integration solutions to prepare data for the use case will accelerate a payer’s ability to leverage fit-for-purpose data as a strategic asset for better decision making and better health outcomes.
Interested in learning more? Download our Clinical Data Integration Buyer’s Guide today!